Spanish Words for Use Around the Home

If youre like most of us, chances are you spend more time at home than you do anywhere else. So if youre looking at expanding your Spanish vocabulary, you might consider starting with some of the places youre most familiar with. Following, then, are the most common Spanish words used for places and items in the house. Note that many of the words can vary with region, and many of the words can have other meanings in other contexts. For example, while dormitorio is a common word for bedroom, it also can refer to the sleeping car of a train. Rooms and Areas of the House attic: el à ¡tico, el desvà ¡n, el entretechobasement: el sà ³tanobathroom: el baà ±o, el cuarto de baà ±o, el retretebedroom: el dormitoriocloset, wardrobe: el armario, el roperocourtyard: el patioden, study: el estudiodining room: el comedorentryway: la entradafamily room: la estancia, el cuarto de estargarage: el garage, la cocherakitchen: la cocinaliving room: la sala de estar, el salà ³nroom: el cuarto Words for Built-in Features ceiling: el techocupboard: el armario, la despensadoor: la puertaelectrical socket: el enchufe (de pared)faucet: el grifofloor: el suelo (floor that is walked on), el piso (level of a building)(kitchen) counter: el mostrador (de cocina), la encimera (other words are also used in various areas)lamp: la là ¡mparalight: la luz, la là ¡mpara, la là ¡mpara de techo (ceiling light), el plafà ³n (ceiling light)mirror: el espejoroof: el tejadosink: el fregadero, el fregadero de cocina (kitchen sink), el fregadero de baà ±o (bathroom sink)stairs: la escalera, las escalerastoilet: el và ¡ter, el wà ¡ter, el inodoro, el servicio, el retretewall: la pared (inside), el muro (outside)window: la ventana Words for Appliances and Furniture bed: la camablender: la licuadorachair: la sillachest of drawers: la cà ³modacouch, sofa: el sofà ¡, el divà ¡ndishwasher: el lavavajillas, el lavaplatos, el friegaplatos (These are all compound nouns.)drier (for clothes): la secadorairon: la planchaoven: el horno (el horno microondas, or simply el microondas, microwave oven)stove: la estufa, la cocina (usage varies with region)table: la mesatoaster: el tostador, la tostadoravacuum cleaner: la aspiradorawasher (for clothes): la lavadora

Situational Conditioning And Classical Conditioning

In the world today, psychology plays a huge role. There are many psychological factors people use on a day to day basis. Many factors such as the way people act, talk, think, and go about their day have some form of psychological conditioning or theory. However, people are unaware of the factors they put in on a day to day basis. Psychologists have made it so that people can fully comprehend these theories. This paper will show how everyday scenarios in the educational field can be broken down and analyzed through behaviorism, the different types of conditionings, and how people learn from them. Behaviorism is â€Å"primarily concerned with observable behavior, as opposed to internal events like thinking and emotion† (McLeod, S.A, 2013). That is to say, people learn by what they see and not necessarily how they feel. There are different types of behavioral conditioning. There is operant conditioning and classical conditioning. Classical conditioning â€Å"basically involves forming an association between two stimuli resulting in a learned response† (Cherry K.A 2005). There are two stimuli involved: unconditioned stimulus and conditioned stimulus. Unconditioned stimulus is where â€Å"there is no learning involved in connecting the stimulus† ( Huitt, W., Hummel, J. 1997). In other words, the stimulus is a form of a person’s body responding naturally. Conditioned stimulus is when learning is used to associate an object with a stimulus. There is also the neutral stimulus which doesn’tShow MoreRelatedAnalytical Study on the Employee Issues in an MNC1756 Words   |  7 Pagesfunctions. But this theory is also fail because effectiveness of leaders behaviour depends on many factors like subordinates nature and the situation which is not described in this theory. Situational Theory According to this theory, a leaders effectiveness will be measured by the leaders behaviour and situational factors. Leaders behaviour includes the characteristics and hierarchical position of leader. According to A.G. Jago and Victor H. Vroom, (1977) the degree of leaders participation affectsRead MoreAnalysis Of Herbert Blumer s Social Movement1738 Words   |  7 Pagesexhibit psychological phenomenon present in the behavioral perspective, in regards to classical and operant conditioning, and the social cultural perspective, in regards to conformity and group influence. In regards to the Behavioral perspective of psychology, behavior is seen as learning by association, particularly through classical conditioning and operant conditioning (Alexanderson, 2016). Classical conditioning is the pairing of an unconditioned stimulus with a conditioned stimulus in order toRead MoreInsight Into Criminal Behavior Essay1735 Words   |  7 Pagesbiological make-up such as heredity, neurotransmitter dysfunction, and brain abnormalities as major components in criminal behavior. Each approach consists of different methods of control, expression of behavior, and influences on criminal behavior. Situational and environmental factors provide setting and opportunity for crime to occur. Cultural forces help us analyze the context for occurring crimes. Phenomenological determines the personal meaning that a crime holds for the offender. Different researchersRead MoreWhy Learning Theories Are Relative And How They Affect Behavior Essay1647 Words   |  7 Pagesfamily proposed by Thorndike, Pavlov, Watson, Skinner and Hull (Knowles, Swanson, Holton, 2012). This theory of learning is otherwise known as behaviorism. This theory of learning is based upon the idea that all behaviors are acquired through conditioning as a result of our interaction with the environment. The behaviorist assumption is that incoming stimuli from the environment shapes the individuals behavior and as a consequence, teaches them to learn. A common statement about behaviorism is thatRead MoreMajor Principles of Behaviorist and Neo-Behaviorist Theories2412 Words   |  10 Pagesdiscipline of learning. Disregarding the specific phases in behaviorism and neo-behaviorism, the paper will synthesize the literary findings of major theories. Two theories that are based on behaviorist perspective of learning i.e. classical conditioning and operant conditioning theory will be discussed along with one neo-behaviorist perspective theory. After presenting underlying principles of each of the three theories, the work of major contributors of these theories will be highlighted. Followed byRead MoreUnderstanding And Supporting Behaviour1726 Words   |  7 PagesProtection Act 1998 the name of the older adult involved in the care has been changed to Client X. Why challenging behaviour occurs can be explored and explained through many different avenues such as through the use of psychological theories and situational factors that can effect behaviour. A class discussion found a definition of challenging behaviour to be ‘Difficulty breaking though to or working with an individual/group with behaviour that is challenging for you personally to deal with regardlessRead MoreLiving with the Extreme Fear Created by Anxiety Disorders Essay3389 Words   |  14 Pagesenvironment, blood-injection-injury, and situational (Burstein et al. 1073). Animal phobias include fear of specific animals, like fear of rats, fear of spiders, and fear of dogs. Natural environment phobias involve fear of heights, fear of water, fear of the dark, fear of storms, and many others. Blood-injection-injury phobias include fear of injury, fear of blood, fear of needles, and other medical procedures. On the other hand, examples of situational phobias – fears triggered by specific situationsRead MorePsychology and Impact Personality Development1997 Words   |  8 Pages1. Define personality. 2. Analyze how biological, situational and mental processes impact personality development. 3. Discuss social and cultural contributions to personality development. 4. Describe the major dispositional theories of personality. 5. Describe the major process theories of personality. 6. Evaluate the major personality theories. 7. Discuss the strengths and weaknesses of commonly used personality assessment techniques, validity, reliability. Define personality. Personality Read MorePsychology and Impact Personality Development2008 Words   |  9 Pages1. Define personality. 2. Analyze how biological, situational and mental processes impact personality development. 3. Discuss social and cultural contributions to personality development. 4. Describe the major dispositional theories of personality. 5. Describe the major process theories of personality. 6. Evaluate the major personality theories. 7. Discuss the strengths and weaknesses of commonly used personality assessment techniques, validity, reliability. Define personality. Personality *Read MoreOrganizational Behavior7738 Words   |  31 PagesDisciplines to the OB Field (cont’d) Anthropology The study of societies to learn about human beings and their activities. E X H I B I T 1–3 (cont’d) E X H I B I T 1–3 (cont’d) There Are Few Absolutes in OB Contingency variables: It Depends!!! Situational factors that make the main relationship between two variables change---e.g., the relationship may hold for one condition but not another. In Country 1 x In Country 2 x May be related to May NOT be related to y y There are few absolutes in

Nuclear warfare Free Essays

Introduction. John Hersey’s article entitled Hiroshima was an account of six residents in the city of the same name who survived the bombing on August 6, 1945. The six survivors consisted of a physician, a personnel clerk, three small children and their mother, a young surgeon, a pastor and a missionary priest. We will write a custom essay sample on Nuclear warfare or any similar topic only for you Order Now Compared to other accounts of the Hiroshima bombing, Hersey’s account dryly described the experiences of the survivors, beginning from the time they woke up until the time the bomb went off. While it made considerable noise within and without the publishing world, Hersey’s account was not intentionally written as a call to action, nor did it eventually give rise to a mass action. Rather, it was intended to be a mere impassive report of the impact made by the bomb on the lives of many. Ethical Theories. There are many reasons for the opinion that nuclear warfare is not morally justified, the most familiar and popular of which is the opinion that nuclear warfare involves an intention to use nuclear weapons, where such use would be immoral (McMahan, 1985).  Moral philosophy has several positions on the issue of nuclear warfare. One such position falls within the deontological position (McMahan, 1985). This position consists of three claims, the first of which is that the use of nuclear weapons is not morally justified (McMahan, 1985).  Ã‚  Ã‚  Ã‚  Ã‚   This first argument is rationalized by the theory that use of nuclear weapons would lead to a violation of at least one criterion of the traditional â€Å"just war† theory (McMahan, 1985). The just war theory refers to justice in war or moral support for war (Moseley, 2006). This theory has two aspects, namely, the theoretical and historical traditions (Moseley, 2006). The former discusses the justifications and reasons for engaging in war; while the latter focuses attention on the body of rules and agreements entered into by international bodies that are supposed to be applied in times of war (Moseley, 2006). The just war theory has two criteria, namely, the criterion of proportionality and the criterion of discrimination (McMahan, 1985). The first one mandates that â€Å"the level of force employed must be proportional to the good it is intended to achieve (McMahan, 1985).† On the other hand, the latter criterion provides that â€Å"force should be used in a way which respects the distinction between combatants and noncombatants (McMahan, 1985). Applying the two criteria, one can arrive at an opinion as to whether the dropping of the bomb in both Nagasaki and Hiroshima was justified. The first criterion demands that an act be justified by the good consequences achieved by the act be able to outweigh the negative consequences it may have caused (McMahan, 1985). Moreover, there must be a direct proportion between the degree of force used and the positive consequences produced (McMahan, 1985). Considering that both bomb attacks had caused the loss of numerous lives, mostly those of innocent citizens, there is no way that they could have been justified by any positive consequences. Whichever motivation led to the decision to set off the attacks, it could never be enough to justify the killing of countless innocent lives. The brutality of the acts involved in both bombings negate any argument that there is a direct proportion between the act committed or the degree of force used and the consequences it produced. The second criterion cannot also be used to justify the bombings, since it forbids the killing of noncombatants in war (McMahan, 1985). A distinction should be made between people who are combatants and not (McMahan, 1985). However, based on numerous accounts on the effects of the bombings, including that written by Hersey, it is apparent that many people who were noncombatants died during the attacks. This is a clear violation of the second criterion of the just war theory (McMahan, 1985). Again applying the deontological tradition, any future use of nuclear weapons in war cannot be justified. The use of that kind of weapons is a deliberate choice made by those who lead the war. They know that such use necessarily involves the killing of man innocent people. As argued by one study, deaths occurring in nuclear attacks are neither incidental nor unintentional results of lawful military action (McMahan, 1985). Rather, such deaths are deliberate aims made by those who chose to act using nuclear weapons (McMahan, 1985). Thus, the same argument would negate any justification that would be put forward by a country that intends to retaliate using nuclear weapons. Retaliation can be exercised in various forms and it is recognized under international law to be valid means of protecting a country’s interests and sovereignty. Nevertheless, even through a good reason exists for retaliation, doing the same through nuclear weapon still cannot be justified because of the consequences involved in such action, which would cost thousands, if not millions, of lives. Indeed, nuclear warfare is no room for the ancient adage â€Å"an eye for an eye.† Other means of retaliation, like demanding reparation or using economic measures, should instead be used rather than resorting to nuclear warfare. Conclusion. Nuclear warfare cannot be justified under any circumstance. The deliberate use of nuclear weapons is equivalent to deliberate killing of numerous innocent people. Such an act cannot be considered proportionate to the aim involved; nor would such act discriminate between people who engaged in war or not. These consequences obviously violate criteria of the just war theory, which negates any morality in the acts. References Hersey, J. (1946). Hiroshima. The New Yorker. McMahan, J. (1985). Deterrence and Deontology. Ethics 95(3) Special Issue: Symposium on Ethics and Nuclear Deterrence, 517-536. Moseley, A. (2006). Just War Theory. Retrieved October 31, 2007, from http://www.iep.utm.edu/justwar/ How to cite Nuclear warfare, Essay examples

Great Virtues free essay sample

I think that Aversion to Tyranny definitely still exists In America today. We still do not have any dictatorship In todays America. We vote as a democracy for our presidents, congress, etc. We do have a president, to represent America and to help make final decisions, but we get to choose who we want to elect. Basically, its power to the people, even though we have a presidential leader to help guide us. The second virtue Ben Franklin wanted America to have was Free Press. Basically, what this meant was that you can write or print whatever youd like and not et in trouble for it.Although there were some limits to this, there was little to no government control of the press. This let people say what they wanted and free minded write in the press. Franklin said, There would be very little printed, if publishers produced only things that offended nobody. l, myself have to agree to this, because If you think about it, its true. Franklin also believed that the surest guard against tyranny and arbitrary power was free expression, the free flow of Ideas and a free press. He felt no tyrannical society could long exist, If It cannot control the low of information and ideas.Like the first virtue, free press still exists today. You are able to freely write what youd like in the press. For example, it is okay to write to the newspapers and write a letter to the editor and express your feelings and preferences. That is legal, and no one can tell you that you arent allowed to do that. The third virtue Ben Franklin wanted America to have was Humor. Franklin liked the idea of using playful and safe humor in life. He believed that if there wasnt much humor, life would be boring and serious, and not as much fun. Franklin used moor even against himself.He created a character In Poor Richard Saunders, the pseudonym he used when he began to publish an annual almanac. The beauty of Inventing a fictional author was that he could poke fun at himself by admitting half seriously that money was his main motivation. Humor is exists in America today, as well. People use it everyday, and, to say the uses humor, it could make them laugh, no matter how upset they were. Who knows what life would be without any humor. All I know is that it would be quite dull, and this country would not be as good of a place to live in, without it.The fourth virtue Ben Franklin added to the list was Humility. When Franklin made a list of personal virtues for himself that he was intent on acquiring, he very proudly showed it around to his friends, one of whom, a Quaker, pointed out that he had left one off. The friend said that Franklin was often guilty of pride, so Ben added humility to his list. To say the least, he never quite perfected the virtue. Humility means that someone is not prideful in themselves, and not full of themselves or self-absorbed. It means that you are more modest, and dont brag.You will listen to there, and give credit; instead of listening and then start talking about yourself. Humility exists, and doesnt exist today in different ways. Sometimes, we have humility, and other times we dont. Not everyones perfect, at times we may brag or boast about ourselves a little or a lot; either way we are still not being humble. Although he was guilty of it himself, Franklin hoped that America would become more humble, and maybe it has, but whether there is a little or large amount of people not being modest, we are still breaking this virtue.The fifth virtue Ben Franklin put on the list of Americas virtues was Idealism in Foreign Policy. Franklin once wrote, The influence of every power is measured by the opinion one has of its intrinsic force. When he went to Paris as an envoy during the Revolution, Franklin proved himself a master of the diplomatic doctrine of realism by playing an adroit balance-of-power game between France, Spain, the Netherlands, and later on, Britain. The main idea of this virtue, as I see it, is that Franklin basically tried to portray each countrys position as desirable to him.In a way, this virtue still exists in America today. The only thing I can think of for this virtue in todays world is Iraq. Even though it isnt ideal to be at war with a country, we do our best to fight against them and eventually hopefully end the war and win it. The sixth virtue Ben Franklin wanted was Compromise. Franklin used the phrase, Both sides must part with some of their demands, many times. He used it the most when the Constitutional Convention was deciding on the issue of whether the new Congress should be proportioned by population or have equal votes for each state.For Franklin, who personally believed in proportional representation, compromise was not only a practical approach but also a moral one. He believed that compromisers may not be great heroes, but they do make great democracies. To compromise, it means that each side will give up one or more thing that they wanted to make it fair, since both sides couldnt get everything they wanted. In this way, it makes it fairer to compromise, than to have everything one side wants. Because, when you compromise, each side may not get everything they want, but they take a little of each side and make it even. I believe that compromising still exists in America today. Compromises are made and it exists in many different ways. America compromises with political issues and with economics also. We, as a country, compromise with other countries, when we exchange or buy products, as for how much we pay and how much products we get in exchange. The same goes for politics, not everyone can get their way, so we compromise and hopefully both sides Tolerance. The great struggles of the 20th century were against fascism and then communism.The great struggle of the 21st century will be between the forces of fanatic fundamentalism and tolerance. It is vital that we remember that America was not born with the virtue of religious tolerance, but had to earn it. For example, Franklin left Boston and ended up in Philadelphia, a place unlike much of the world. There were Lutheran, Moravian, Quakers, and even Jews living side by side in what became as the City of Brotherly Love. Franklin helped formulate the creed that they would all be better off, personally and economically, if they embraced an attitude of tolerance.So, basically, everyone had to have tolerance for other people, (and their religion) even if it wasnt of their liking, and accept their choices. I definitely think that tolerance still exists in America today. I actually think that it has gotten better. More people are accepting other peoples preferences and religions now than when Franklin was President. I think people realize that its okay to have different religions, and that you should respect others of their religious choices. I believe that the strongest virtue in America today is Humor.The reason why I think this is because I think a lot of people use humor in everyday life and its the virtue that comes the most naturally. If you think about it, America is full of humor, more than any of the other seven virtues. This is why I think it is the strongest. I think the weakest virtue in America today is Humility. There is still a lot of bragging and boasting coming from people of all ages. People will brag about anything they can think of, whether its about money or how great their Christmas lights are.Thats not what kind of country Benjamin Franklin wanted; he wanted a country that was more modest, and not as full of themselves. Im not saying that everyone in the US is like this, but some are, and its not exactly the best quality to have. The most important virtues for Americans to follow today are An Aversion to Tyranny, Compromise, and Free Press. If people didnt follow An Aversion to Tyranny, this entry could be a lot different. Its possible that we could have a different type of leader in charge and we couldnt get to choose who the leader was. If half of America decides they dont want to have a president anymore then we would really not know what to do. If people didnt follow the virtue to Compromise, it would also affect our country a lot. Without any compromising, nothing would get done and nothing would get bought. If you think about when youre buying a house or a car, if you dont compromise to get the price you want then you wont be able to purchase it. Each did has to give a little for things to work, and if neither side wanted to compromise, it would be very hard for the house or car to get sold, and for you to be able to purchase one for the price you want. Free Press, is a very important virtue for the US to have and to follow as well. Without it, I think America would be an angrier place to live, and people could possibly get in more fights because they were taking out their feelings on people instead of writing them down, to the newspaper. Even though a lot of people dont free write to the newspaper, they can still read what there people are writing to it, and see what other people are struggling with.Maybe the people who were reading the newspaper were struggling with the same issue that the person who wrote it were and that could help the person reading it with their problems as well. Ben Franklin wrote these virtues as advice for Americans, Americans today is to remember these seven virtues, and try your best to follow and respect them, as Franklin wanted. If everyone was aware of the seven virtues Ben Franklin wrote, and learned about them and truly tried their best to follow them, it could actually make a difference in this world. Maybe there would be less fighting if people were more humble and didnt brag as much.Maybe things would get done faster if people would Just take the time to compromise and work things out. We should try to be tolerant of others because if you try your best at being open-minded, it will help you become a better person, and it will help you get along with others better. If everybody tried their absolute best on all of the seven virtues that Franklin wanted for America, it really could make a difference. So, my advice to you is to follow them, and work at them everyday, and maybe one day we will have the America that Ben Franklin wanted.